Thursday, November 4, 2010

GOP's Environmental Roots

Great GOP leaders of the past fought to save natural treasures, signed landmark environmental-protection laws, and established many of the environmental policies we take for granted today.

Teddy Roosevelt, established America's unmatched system of wildlife refuges and national parks. Barry Goldwater, was the father of conservatism, and a lifelong conservationist.

Richard Nixon understood the environment’s importance to the public. Richard Nixon signed the Clean Air Act, the Endangered Species Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, and also established the Environmental Protection Agency.

Ronald Reagan signed a treaty to protect the upper atmosphere’s protective ozone layer from chemical emissions in 1987. The treaty was the most significant international environmental agreement ever negotiated.

As Ronald Reagan said, “What is a conservative, after all, but one who conserves. We want to protect and conserve the land on which we live – our countryside, our rivers and mountains, our plains and meadows and forests. This is our patrimony. This is what we leave to our children. And our great moral responsibility is to leave it better than we found it.”

The Bi-partisan efforts of previous decades succeeded in putting an end to environmental catastrophes like burning rivers, toxic waste dumps and DDT.

Modern day Republicans have no special exemption from polluted air and contaminated water. They would do well to remember the past and the environmental legacies of some of their finest leaders.


Related Posts
Conservatism is Green
Republicans for Environmental Protection
Red States and Green Consumers

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I am very pleased to see this position in a conservative blog!!! I might even consider voting conservative if this catches on...

Richard Matthews said...

Although The Green Market is not a conservative blog, many of us would consider voting for any party that prioritizes the environment. Sadly, conservative voters are currently antagonistic to any government support for environmental efforts.